<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Research Administration and Finance &#187; Barb Bucchianeri</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/author/bbucchianeri/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf</link>
	<description>Northeastern University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:52:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of FY 2013 Sequestration Order on NSF Awards</title>
		<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/impact-of-fy-2013-sequestration-order-on-nsf-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/impact-of-fy-2013-sequestration-order-on-nsf-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb Bucchianeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/?p=2206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Letter to University Leaders from Subra Suresh Director, NSF     http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/in133/in133.pdf]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Letter to University Leaders from Subra Suresh Director, NSF     <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/in133/in133.pdf">http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2013/in133/in133.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/impact-of-fy-2013-sequestration-order-on-nsf-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIH Public Access Policy Changes</title>
		<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-public-access-policy-changes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-public-access-policy-changes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb Bucchianeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/?p=2208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With this Notice, NIH informs grantees that in Spring, 2013, at the earliest, NIH will delay processing of non-competing continuation grant awards if publications arising from that award are not in compliance with the NIH public access policy.  The award will not be processed until recipients have demonstrated compliance.  This change will take effect in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With this Notice, NIH informs grantees that in Spring, 2013, at the earliest, NIH will delay processing of non-competing continuation grant awards if publications arising from that award are not in compliance with the NIH public access policy.  The award will not be processed until recipients have demonstrated compliance.  This change will take effect in tandem with NIH requiring the use of the Research Performance Progress Report (RPPRs) for all Streamlined Non-competing Award Process (SNAP) and Fellowship awards in the Spring of 2013.</p>
<p>New Tools<br />
NIH made changes to My NCBI that improve the workflow and communication between PD/PIs and non- PD/PI authors.  It is now easier for PD/PIs to track compliance of all papers arising from their<br />
awards, even they do not author those papers.   (See <a href="http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/ja12/ja12_myncbi_new_features.html">http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/techbull/ja12/ja12_myncbi_new_features.html</a> for details).</p>
<p>Notice # <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-12-160.html">NOT-OD-12-160</a></p>
<h3>NU's Library Services is here to help!</h3>
<h3><a href="http://library.northeastern.edu/services/scholarly-communication/for-faculty/complying-with-the-nih-public-access-policy">http://library.northeastern.edu/services/scholarly-communication/for-faculty/complying-with-the-nih-public-access-policy</a></h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-public-access-policy-changes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSF &#8211; Automated Compliance Checking</title>
		<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nsf-automated-compliance-checking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nsf-automated-compliance-checking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb Bucchianeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/?p=2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beginning March 18, 2013, the NSF will enhance the FastLane system to begin automated compliance checking of all required sections of proposals.  This will bring NSF systems in line with long-standing proposal preparation requirements as outlined in the  NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (PAPPG) ( Chapter II.C.2 of the Grant Proposal Guide [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beginning March 18, 2013, the NSF will enhance the FastLane system to begin automated compliance checking of all required sections of proposals.  This will bring NSF systems in line with long-standing proposal preparation requirements as outlined in the  NSF <i>Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide</i> (PAPPG) ( <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf13001/gpg_2.jsp#IIC2">Chapter II.C.2</a> of the <i>Grant Proposal Guide</i> (GPG)).</p>
<p>The GPG-required sections of a proposal include:</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="319">Project Summary <b>*</b></td>
<td valign="top" width="319">Budget Justification</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="319">Project Description</td>
<td valign="top" width="319">Current and Pending Support</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="319">References Cited</td>
<td valign="top" width="319">Facilities, Equipment and Other Resources</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="319">Biographical Sketch(es)</td>
<td valign="top" width="319">Data Management Plan <b>*</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="319">Budget</td>
<td valign="top" width="319">Postdoctoral Mentoring Plan (if applicable)<b>*</b></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><b>* </b>These proposal sections are already being auto-compliance checked by FastLane.</p>
<p>Proposal submission instructions for conferences, symposia or workshops; international travel grants; or program solicitations may deviate from the GPG instructions.  If the submission instructions do not require one of the above sections to be provided, proposers will need to insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, “Not Applicable.”  Doing so will enable FastLane to accept the proposal.</p>
<p>Additionally, proposers providing Biographical Sketches and/or Current and Pending Support information for Principal Investigators (PIs), co-PI(s) or Senior Personnel in a single PDF file associated with the PI, must insert text or upload a document in that section of the proposal that states, “Not Applicable,” for any co-PI or Senior Personnel so that FastLane will accept the proposal.</p>
<p>PIs will receive a warning message if any of the GPG-required sections is missing, however, the PI will still be able to submit the proposal to the organization’s Sponsored Project Office (SPO).  If the SPO attempts to submit proposal that is missing any of the GPG required sections, they will receive an error message identifying the missing section(s), and FastLane will prevent submission to NSF.  After obtaining all required sections, the SPO may submit the proposal to NSF in accordance with the established deadline date policy.</p>
<p>Proposals submitted through Grants.gov must include all GPG required sections or include a document stating that the section is “Not Applicable.”</p>
<p>Additional information will be posted on the NSF website at: <a href="http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/autocompliance.jsp">http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/autocompliance.jsp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nsf-automated-compliance-checking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NIH Continuous Submission: Can I or Can&#8217;t I?</title>
		<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-continuous-submission-can-i-or-cant-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-continuous-submission-can-i-or-cant-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb Bucchianeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/?p=2183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occasionally we get  this question: “I have participated in the peer review process, how do I know if I am eligible for Continous Submission?”  Well, to answer that question effectively, let me review what the peer review process is and why that makes some people eligible for this perk called Continuous Submission. NIH evaluates applications [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occasionally we get  this question: “I have participated in the peer review process, how do I know if I am eligible for Continous Submission?”  Well, to answer that question effectively, let me review what the peer review process is and why that makes some people eligible for this perk called <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/continuous_submission.htm">Continuous Submission</a>.</p>
<p>NIH evaluates applications by a dual <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer_review_process.htm">peer review process</a> as mandated by statute, in accordance with section 492 of the Public Health Service Act and federal regulations governing "Scientific Peer Review of Research Grant Applications and Research and Development Contract Projects."</p>
<p>The first level of review is carried out by a Scientific Review Group (SRG) composed primarily of non-federal scientists who have expertise in relevant scientific disciplines and current research areas. The second level of review is performed by Institute and Center (IC) National Advisory Councils or Boards. Councils are composed of both scientific and public representatives chosen for their expertise, interest, or activity in matters related to health and disease.</p>
<p>As a way of recognizing their service to NIH, reviewers with substantial review service are permitted to submit their research grant applications (R01, R21, or R34) on a continuous basis and to have those applications undergo initial peer review in a timely manner. This process is referred to as <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/continuous_submission.htm">Continuous Submission</a> and applies to those peer reviewers with recent substantial service (six times in 18 months).</p>
<p><strong>It is important to note that the <a href="http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/continuous_submission.htm">Continuous Submission</a> option ONLY applies to the R01, R21, and R34 Activity Codes and ONLY to FOAs using those activities with standard submission dates. </strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/02/nih-continuous-submission-can-i-or-cant-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSF Annual, Final and Interim Project Reporting Change</title>
		<link>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/01/nsf-annual-final-and-interim-project-reporting-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/01/nsf-annual-final-and-interim-project-reporting-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Barb Bucchianeri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/?p=2169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NSF awardees must stop submitting project reports via use of FastLane starting on February 1, 2013. On March 18, 2013, NSF will transfer its current project reporting service from FastLane to Research.gov.  Principal Investigators should pay particular attention to reports previously submitted and returned by their NSF Program Officer.   Returned reports should be revised and [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>NSF awardees must stop submitting project reports via use of FastLane starting on February 1, 2013.</b></p>
<p>On March 18, 2013, NSF will transfer its current project reporting service from FastLane to Research.gov.  Principal Investigators should pay particular attention to reports previously submitted and returned by their NSF Program Officer.   Returned reports should be revised and resubmitted prior to February 1.  To assist the research community with this transition, the overdue date will be<br />
extended for all project reports that are currently scheduled to become overdue between January 31 and April 30, 2013.</p>
<p><strong>An informational Webinar, "Project Reports on Research.gov: What's In It For Me?", will be offered January 16, 2013.  To participate in this webinar, please email NSF at webinars@research.gov and include your name and the name of the webinar you would like to attend. After they receive your email they will send you instructions for how to log into the webinar.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.northeastern.edu/research/raf/2013/01/nsf-annual-final-and-interim-project-reporting-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
