Joseph E. Aoun
President, Northeastern University
Posted: January 4, 2010 02:54 PM
In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy announced that his government will invest €35 billion--more than $50 billion--to expand the country's universities and museums. In Pittsburgh, Mayor Luke Ravensthal recently proposed a 1 percent tax on tuition collected by the city's 10 colleges and universities.
President Sarkozy aims to transform the nation's universities into world-class institutions. Mayor Ravensthal aims to "save" a faltering city pension fund. (Even though a deal is being crafted to avoid the new tax, its proposal represents a warning shot.)
The U.S. has long championed (and benefited from) the link between higher education and advancement. Today, other nations seek to emulate our success by imitating our model. In addition to Sarkozy's recent move, many countries, particularly in Asia, are investing billions in the development of leading research institutions.
It is ironic--and a cause for concern--that around the world the commitment to higher education is dramatically increasing, while here it is under siege. In many East Coast cities we are seeing renewed calls to eliminate the tax-exempt status for non-profit colleges and universities. These and similar proposals, such as taxing tuition and endowments, are both short-sighted and self-defeating.
While it is not surprising that college and university leaders oppose taxes on their institutions, the arguments have shifted. Today this issue must be viewed through a global lens.
Consider some new facts. This fall, the London-based Times Higher Education published its annual list of Top 200 Global Universities. South Korea, Japan and China have increased their representation in the top 200, now claiming 26 spots. The U.S. lost four spots to other countries, going from 58 last year to 54 today. A recent Pew Survey revealed that for the first time a plurality of Americans--44 percent--believe China is the world's leading economic power; only 27 percent named the U.S. A year ago, the U.S. was at 40 percent and China 30 percent.
Americans have long accepted the individual benefits of a college degree. Before policymakers take steps that would undermine the world's best system of higher education, they should understand the benefits of the American system as a collective enterprise, particularly as it positions the U.S. for leadership in the world economy:
The strength of these points should not imply that American higher education is without its challenges. To achieve President Obama's bold college attainment goals, the American model will need to change and diversify. Different aspects of globalization will force universities out of traditional comfort zones; insular approaches will give way to genuine global partnerships.
The bottom line, however, is clear: In a globally competitive marketplace, the nation that is home to an unparalleled higher education system would be wise to invest in its continued strength.