By Charles Coe
In September 1964, Jackie Platt
sat in her first class at Northeastern's brand-new Burlington campus. Her
classmates were mostly women like her: in their forties, married, with
children at home. Some needed just a few courses to finish degrees; others
were being exposed to higher education for the first time and were a little
nervous and unsure of what to expect.
Many of the women had been active in church and volunteer
groups. But many had always felt that something was missing from their
lives because they hadn't finished college. One night in the spring of
1964, Platt attended a meeting of the League of Women Voters in Wilmington,
Massachusetts. Someone stood to read a notice, and Platt perked up her
ears. Classes for Northeastern University's new Programs for Adult Women
were soon to open at a satellite campus in Burlington, north of Boston.
Platt enrolled without a second thought. That first day,
she filed into a classroom with other women who seemed familiar, yet who
she knew not in the least. Into the room walked the lecturer, Tom Lester,
decked out in porkpie hat, bow tie, and Harris tweed jacket. He looked
at the gathering, took off his coat and hat, and carefully set them on
the table at the head of the class. Then he stood silently for a moment
and scanned the expectant faces. "I've been teaching for a long time,"
he finally said. "But I've never seen so many women's faces at once."
Of course, women's colleges were well established in the
Boston area and across the commonwealth. By the mid-'60s, women were also
fairly well represented in coed colleges and universities, Northeastern
among them, and N.U. had long welcomed women into its full-time night-school
program. What was fundamentally different about the Women's Program, as
it was routinely called, was that it offered women the opportunity to take
part-time day classes.
For Jackie Platt, a woman with children in school and a husband
who enthusiastically supported her decision to become a student, it was
a perfect arrangement. That first semester (in 1964, Northeastern was on
a ten-week system rather than quarters), she signed up for two classes:
American Literature and Introduction to Music.
Tom Lester taught the literature class, and the first book
he assigned was Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms. "I remember my first
blue book and my first exam," Platt says today. "The night before,
I underlined sections of the book, took out a map, and tried to figure
out where everything was happening. I was ready to toss back any name or
place the teacher asked for."
But Lester threw her, and the rest of the class, a curve
when he strolled over to the chalkboard and scribbled the question: "Why
did Hemingway write this book in four parts?" Platt hadn't even realized
he had. "I absolutely froze," she says. "In my academic
background, you just soaked up all the facts from your notes and then squeezed
your sponge for the test. This was the first time a teacher ever asked
me what I thought."
The next class, blue books were passed back and all flipped
to the last page for their grades. One student, Gladys Cooper, an elegant
woman with well-coiffed gray hair and a taste for Bloomingdale's dresses,
looked Lester in the eye and demanded, "So why did Hemingway write
A Farewell to Arms in four parts?" Lester looked a little surprised
at the question, and then shrugged. "How the hell do I know?"
There was a second of stunned silence, and then the class
erupted in laughter. For Platt, it was a liberating moment. "I realized
then that being a student was more than just saying what was 'right' or
'wrong.' Tom didn't want a bunch of names and dates," she says. "And
he didn't want you to parrot someone else's ideas. It didn't matter what
your viewpoint was; if you could give a good argument, a good defense of
your position, he'd accept it."

As N.U. president Asa Knowles
had come to realize, nontraditional female students represented a tremendous
untapped potential. Many of them had already distinguished themselves in
their work with volunteer service organizations. And then, as now, any
woman running a household was essentially managing a small business.
Because Northeastern's Women's Program offered unprecedented
flexibility, women with varying needs and goals had access to a college
education that would otherwise have been unavailable to them. The program
served graduates, first-time students, transfers, teacher certification
candidates. Women who were beginning or continuing degree programs, as
well as those who were interested primarily in personal enrichment, made
their way to Burlington. Women could take classes in current political
issues, electronic data processing, history, literature, mathematics, and
more.
What distinguished the Women's Program was not simply that
it gave women access to higher education; there was already a healthy enrollment
of women in N.U.'s day program, and many women attended classes at the
night school. What made the program unique was that it offered part-time
programs in the daytime. For women like Lucia Bequaert, that made all the
difference. Bequaert had attended Wellesley College, but in her senior
year, right after World War II, she had dropped out to get married. A year
of classes still stood between her and a B.A. In 1964, divorced and eager
to restart her career, she began classes in Burlington that would soon
lead to a degree in sociology. "There was some resistance at first
to setting up the program, because some administrators didn't like the
idea of admitting part-time day students," she recalls. "They
thought that 'serious' students should either attend a full-time day program
or just stick with night school courses."
But the times were changing, and fortunately for Bequaert
and her classmates, the university managed to change with them. This change
was no revolution, though. Most women weren't throwing in the dish-towel
for the sheepskin. As chief cooks and bottle-washers, they still had to
be home for their families. The kids had to be packed off to school in
the morning and urged on with their homework in the afternoon. Dinner had
to be on the table in the evening and the housework done by bedtime. "We
needed daytime classes so we could send our children off to school,"
Bequaert says. "Otherwise, most of us just wouldn't have been able
to take classes."
For several years before the Burlington campus opened, N.U.
had been examining ways to serve nontraditional female students. In April
1960, Knowles addressed the American Council on Education's Commission
on the Education of Women, declaring, "There is a growing awareness
that this nation and the society as a whole are seriously in need of the
full potential of the brainpower available in both sexes."
Over the following few years, Northeastern worked to create
a program that would serve the varied needs of women who wanted to begin
or continue college-level work but were unable to attend night school or
a conventional full-time day program. While the administration was busy
designing the program, it was also considering the question of where to
put it. Classes were held at Burlington High School while the university
searched for an appropriate permanent site, a search that finally ended
when Knowles learned of a beautiful piece of land atop a hill near the
Burlington/Woburn line. The property, formerly a Nike missile site, became
available when the federal government declared it surplus.
The university purchased the land and constructed a building
divided into twenty-two classrooms, a cafeteria, an auditorium, and conference
rooms. There were already two buildings on the site: an administration
building which the university converted into a library, and a former firehouse
which became a computer room (the mammoth computers of that day needed
a lot of space). In February 1964, the Burlington campus officially opened
for business. It was a success almost at once: by early 1965, around 400
women were enrolled in classes there.

Who were these women who took
to calling themselves the "Original 400"? In January 1965, 244
of them responded to a survey that revealed the following: 96 percent were
married, and 62 percent had four or more children. Four percent worked
full-time, 12 percent worked part-time, and 5 percent had never held a
job. Twenty-three percent had done no academic work beyond high school.
About their reasons for returning to school, 70 percent listed personal
growth and self-fulfillment as the primary motivation, 19 percent listed
preparation for future employment, and 7 percent intended to earn degrees.
Susan Keats was as representative as any member of this diverse
group could be. The Women's Program was her second go at higher education;
the first had ended after her sophomore year, when she dropped out at age
nineteen to marry a Navy man. "My husband and I made a pact that as
soon as we got settled down a bit I'd resume my education," she says
today. After moving around for a few years and having children, she and
her family returned to Massachusetts in 1965, and she began classes in
Burlington. "What I really liked about the Women's Program was its
flexibility," she says. "There were women of all ages and backgrounds
in the program, and whatever your situation you could count on your classmates'
support." Keats would bring her baby to class and set her on the floor
in a basket, and often brought her older son along as well. "No one
minded any of this," Keats remembers.
The passage from domestic to academic life wasn't always
easy. In September 1964, Gladys Bishop, who had enrolled in two classes,
was a wife and a mother of two and was already working almost full-time
at Polaroid Corporation as a personnel assistant. Writing in the third
person, she prepared an essay for her English class that illustrated just
how difficult it could be for women in her situation to balance the competing
demands of their lives:
While cooking dinner she thinks about the human brain, or
the predicate adjective she discussed in class. During homework assignments
she thinks about the pudding she should have prepared instead of the cookies
she hastily picked up at the supermarket. She begins to think of herself
as not a very good wife and mother, and certainly not a very good student
if she doesn't even know how to study!
But like many of her classmates, Bishop caught a second wind.
The key was learning how to focus on the job at hand.
When undivided attention begins to develop in each area,
dinners are prepared with only dinner planning in mind, and study periods
are spent as they should be . . . on homework assignments. Her frustrations
begin to diminish because each of her responsibilities are placed in proper
perspective and she finally recognizes that she is, indeed, capable.
The "Original 400" had a sense that they were pioneers.
Many of the women in the program had read Betty Friedan's book, The Feminine
Mystique, published in 1963, or were at least aware of what Friedan had
to say. They were intelligent, resourceful, and taking the first tentative
steps away from the restrictive roles many of them had occupied during
the postwar years.
Eugenia Kaledin taught English at the Burlington campus from
1964 to 1968. "It was one of the liveliest teaching environments I've
ever been in," she recalls. "It encouraged women to develop their
minds, to take courses that helped them achieve some real goal-either a
job or a real degree that would let them go on to graduate school. They
were terrific students, because so many of them felt they'd missed out
on a lot in life when they'd been steered into early marriage."
N.U.'s administration helped by being innovative-for example,
accepting credits from other schools, even if the courses had been taken
years before. "One of my students had dropped out of another college
some years before," Kaledin says. "When she tried to go back,
they told her she could only go full-time. And she'd have to take gym!"
"Most schools had all these arbitrary ideas about how
a school should 'test' you for life. The prevailing idea was that the academic
elite should have to go through different rituals that tested your seriousness
of purpose. They wouldn't let people, especially women, go back to school
part-time," Kaledin says. Once given the chance, however, the women
in Burlington showed just how serious they were about scholarship by capturing
most of the top academic awards given to University College's class of
1969.
Inspired by her students, Kaledin went on to write a book,
Mothers and More: American Women in the 1950s, which examined the strategies
many women used to "extend the traditional values of nurturing and
caring into other spheres of activity." She dedicated the book "To
my students in the Programs for Adult Women: Northeastern University, Burlington
Campus, 19641967."
The Women's Program became a professional and academic springboard
for several. Jackie Platt, UC'70, MEd'72, became the program's assistant
director and went on to get a master's degree from N.U. in women's education.
Lucia Bequaert, UC'69, earned a master's degree from Harvard University,
worked as an academic administrator, and, in the late '70s and early '80s,
was executive director of the Boston YWCA. She later taught a course at
Boston College on the sociology of women and wrote a book, Single Women
Alone and Together, exploring the ways single women could enrich their
own lives and the lives of others. Susan Keats, UC'77, earned a master's
in history from N.U. in 1980. She has since taught history at University
College and Northeastern's graduate history program. She's now vice president
of corporate records management for Fidelity Investments in downtown Boston.
For many of the Women's Program participants, the spiritual
benefits equaled the academic and professional ones. As they worked to
re-create themselves, these women discovered a community of shared interests
and enthusiasm. They saw each other through divorces and deaths, children
leaving and grandchildren arriving. After classes they'd meet in the cafeteria-students
and teachers together-to talk about ideas and families and life in general.
"We were all very close and a lot of us are still friends
today," Bequaert says. "I had a sad death in the family while
I was at the Burlington campus, and all those women showed up for me. We
all looked out for each other." Platt reflects that "the Women's
Program changed my whole life. I knew I could learn, but to get a chance
to use that learning, and to have a job, a title, and a paycheck-for me
that was an amazing achievement."
Sometimes those cafeteria discussions could get lively, especially
when they involved local police officers who took classes at the Burlington
campus to earn promotions. "They were bright, ambitious fellows,"
Keats reminisces. "It was often tough to engage them in intellectual
conversations. You had these uppity women arguing against U.S. involvement
in Vietnam and town cops who adamantly opposed anything that sounded like
'liberal opinions.' "
Ironically, the Women's Program fell victim to its own success.
It did so well in meeting its main goal-introducing women to the educational
mainstream-that within a few years it was no longer needed. As the program's
participants began to gravitate toward non-gender-specific professional
and degree-track courses, the women-only courses were subsumed into University
College's continuing-education programs for both sexes. In 1968, the Women's
Program was phased out.
But the lives of its participants were forever changed. The
Women's Program enabled a generation of intelligent and energetic women
to put down their aprons and become anthropologists and lawyers and social
workers. And in the words of Lucia Bequaert, "It really demonstrated
to us that sisterhood is powerful." Once again, Northeastern had addressed
a new educational market and, in the process, performed a valuable human
service.
Charles Coe, formerly a writer/editor in Northeastern's
Office of Publications, is a program coordinator at the Massachusetts Cultural
Council in Boston.
Related links: